![]() ![]() If you're a volume brand these days, you simply have to offer a 'B'-segment supermini-based Crossover SUV. This improved version of the original first generation design was launched in 2017 to allow this model line to continue to appeal to supermini buyers wanting extra versatility, as well as family hatchback customers in search of something more interesting and affordable. That's asking a lot, but this Clio-based design delivers plenty, with super-economical engines, some genuinely clever interior touches and no small dose of style. Renault's little Captur small SUV model aims to deliver a blend of the character and ruggedness of a Crossover, the space and practicality of an MPV and the dynamics and driving refinement of a family hatchback. Weight and Capacities Fuel Tank Capacity (Litres) Standard manufacturers warranty - Mileage NCAP Overall Rating - Effective February 09 Insurance Group 1 - 50 Effective January 07 RENAULT CAPTUR 0 9 FULLPlease speak to the dealership for full current specification. The vehicle information above was correct at time of manufacture. Wheels 17" Explore alloy wheels with black inserts RAID (Renault Anti-Intruder Device) with automatic door locking RENAULT CAPTUR 0 9 FREEHands free access with keycard and start button Passive Safety 3 point seatbelts on all rear seatsĮSC - Electronic Stability Control + traction control ![]() Packs Exterior touch pack Chrome - Captur ISOFIX on front passenger and rear outer seats Rain sensitive wipers + automatic lightingĪutomatic climate control with one touch demist function RENAULT CAPTUR 0 9 WINDOWSI suggest you spend two more minutes in order to find out which car, based on your needs and budget, would be picked by the virtual adviser™, among more than 12.000 different ones in our database.Driver Convenience Cruise control + speed limiterĮxterior Features Body colour door handlesĮlectric front windows + one touch + anti-pinchĮxtra tinted glass in rear windows and tailgate What should decide here though is the way you feel about the two vehicles, and I hope you'll find my guidelines useful in the process. In any case that's my personal view, built upon all the data available to me. It's really tough to make a final decision here, but if I'd need to, I'd say Nissan. It does come at a cost though, and that's the fuel consumption. It all continues in the same direction, with Nissan being considerably quicker, thus putting more smile on driver's face. In my opinion, everything taken into account, the Japanese car offers slightly better overall protection and takes the lead. The most important thing when deciding between any two vehicles should always be safety, both passive and active. Renault appears just a bit more reliable, although the difference is truly marginal. When it comes to fuel economy things look pretty much the same for both cars, averaging around 5.4 liters of fuel per 100 kilometers (53 mpg), in combined cycle. In addition to that it accelerates all the way to 178 kilometers per hour, 7km/h more than the other car. Nissan is undoubtly more agile, reaching 100km/h in 2.3 seconds less than its competitor. That apart, owners of different cars powered by the same engine as the French car rank it on average as 4.6, while the one under the competitor's bonnet gets 4.4 out of 5. Unfortunatelly, I don't have enough insight that would allow me to comment in more details on the specific models level. That's the official data, while our visitors describe reliability of Renault with an average rating of 4.1, and models under the Nissan badge with 4.2 out of 5. Reliability is not the best thing to consider on the make level, but it is worth mentioning that both brands display similar results in faults and breakdowns, when all the models are taken into account. Both vehicles belong to the suv segment, which is generally a very good thing safety-wise, still it doesn't help us solve our dilemma, does it? On the other hand, if we'd like to consider vehicle mass in this context too, which we definitely should, the Japanese car offers a marginal difference of 7% more metal. Moving further on, let's take a closer look at some additional safety-related facts. Good thing is that both vehicles got tested, with the same number of safety stars gained in the process. The first thing to look into here would be the results from European New Car Assessment Programme (Euro NCAP) tests performed on the two cars. The first one has a 3-cylinder, 12-valves 90hp unit, while the other one gets its power and torque from a 4-cylinder, 16-valves 115hp one. Considering they both belong to the suv segment and utilize the same 5-door suv body style and the front wheel drive system, it all comes up to the specific petrol engine choice they offer. Well, these are two pretty similar cars we have here! It's only details that could potentially make the difference. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |